Friday’s unfortunate attack on a Mumbai-bound train in West Bengal and the tragic loss of several innocent lives has once again brought to fore the enormity of the Naxal problem which our country faces today. By all yardsticks, Naxalism today poses the gravest threat to the country’s internal security. The tragic incident has also proved that Centre’s response to the home-grown guerrillas has been ‘inadequate’ and unstructured, if not slow.

The UPA government has time and again invited the Maoist rebels to abjure violence and come to the negotiation table for a proper redressal of their grievances. However, Centre’s appeal for peace with Naxals has borne no fruits so far and the banned ultras have vehemently rejected the truce offer.

I don’t wish to blame Union Home Minister P Chidambaram for his inept handling of the Naxal issue as he has been working tirelessly to improve and strengthen the internal security scenario in the country ever since he assumed charge.

But what disappoints me is the fact that at the UPA government’s much-touted two-pronged strategy – one aiming at the all round development of Naxal-infested regions and the other aiming at ending the deadlock through peaceful manners – has been unstructured and replete with flaws.

The Maoists have, in fact, been using the developed infrastructure in conducting recce of their targeted spots, planting bombs, acquiring sophisticated weaponry - either by looting it or buying them from open arms market, as indicated by Chidambaram himself. Indications are strong about ‘outside help’ being offered to these banned ultras, leading to the disintegration of the Indian state.

The Home Minister has succeeded in achieving unanimity on Centre-state approach towards the Naxal problem and a greater coordination among various agencies in weeding out the problem. However, despite the concerted efforts, we have helplessly failed to avert major tragedies like the attack on CRPF troopers, on bus carrying civilians in Dantewada and derailment of Gyaneshwari express.

Centre’s reluctance in treating Naxals like terrorists and its constant refusal to use armed forces against them is further aggravating the problem. The Centre has so far been sticking to its stand of using central paramilitary forces and local police in dealing with the Maoist rebels.

I would like to stress, that no one has any doubt over the competency and capabilities of the paramilitary forces camping in the Naxal-infested forests to fight and dismantle their network.

But the situation now warrants a change in our approach towards Naxals, who should not be pardoned at any cost.

Although, the Maoists’ hand in Gyaneshwari Express derailment is yet to be established, but if it is confirmed, the opposition parties would step up pressure on the UPA government, forcing it to review its anti-Maoist strategy.

After a string of deadly attacks, the Naxals are still unrelenting and possibly readying themselves for a bloodier confrontation with the armed forces.

Expressing grave concerns over the Naxal issue, Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh has termed Naxalism as the biggest threat to the country's internal security, so the situation now warrants that the issue be treated as a national problem.

The derailment of Gyaneshwari express has also brought to fore that Railways- the life line of India- has become an easy target for Naxals, as any attack unleashes maximum destruction, loss of lives and a big setback to the government.

The incident has also raised serious questions about the safety and well-being of passengers and put to test our preparedness to meet such mishaps and the effectiveness of our rapid response mechanism.

The incident also points towards the failure of our intelligence agencies since they failed to detect that Maoists’ had removed the fishplates or tinkered with the tracks.

Our intelligence agencies should have been at maximum alert and security of tracks should have been reviewed in the wake "black week" declared by Naxals to condemn police atrocities against their leaders and for an immediate halt to an armed campaign against them.

In March, Naxals triggered the derailment of country's prestigious high-speed Rajdhani Express and held it hostage for hours.

The rebels have attacked police, destroyed government buildings and infrastructure at will in recent months and appear undeterred by the Centre’s offensive to clear them out of their jungle bases.

The Maoist rebellion, which began in West Bengal in 1967 in the name of defending the rights of tribal groups, has now spread in rural pockets of as many as 28 states and is hampering economic progress.

The Naxals claim to be fighting against the exploitation of landless labourers and tribals but they have, in fact, waged a war against the Indian state. By killing innocent people, they no longer represent the most oppressed, deprived and exploited sections of our society.

Their disbelief in democratic institutions and people’s representation and their unwillingness to come forward for talks is actually hampering the progress and development of Naxal-affected regions.

The fruits of our economic progress cannot reach the tribals, Dalits, and the poorest of the poor, until and unless the Naxals shun the path of violence.

It is high time that we must stop debating whether Maoist violence is a central or state subject or a law and order problem. The situation now warrants that the Centre must change its ‘soft approach’ towards the Naxals, who have been mercilessly killing innocent people like terrorists and take tough military action against them.

sOURCE--  ZEE NEWS

Read Users' Comments (0)

Centre to tackle naxalism with development, police action

Special Correspondent

Recalling Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s word of caution that Left wing extremism posed the “single biggest internal security challenge,” Home Minister P. Chidambaram on Monday said the Centre’s two-pronged policy was clear — development and police action.

“However, the naxalites are anti-development and have targeted the very instruments of development — school buildings, roads, telephone towers. They know that development will wean the masses away, especially the poor tribals, from the grip of naxalites. Hence, these deliberate attacks on development activities,” he said.

Addressing the Chief Ministers’ Conference on Internal Security, he said the government’s response would focus on police action to wrest control of the territory dominated by naxalites, restoration of civil administration and undertaking development activities.

“We will encourage the State governments to talk to the naxalites — both individuals and local units — on condition that they give up their misconceived ‘armed liberation struggle.’ Let our message to the naxalites be this: we will talk; we will act; we will restore order; and we will undertake developmental activities,” Mr. Chidambaram said.

On the situation in the north-east, he said some State governments in the region allowed themselves to bend before insurgent groups, making the fight against insurgency much more difficult.

The States as well as the Centre shared an onerous responsibility to ensure people’s welfare.

“You [Chief Ministers] have the constitutional power and responsibility in respect of matters relating to ‘public order’ and ‘police.’ However, increasingly, jurists and the general public have emphasised the constitutional duty of the Central government to protect every State against internal disturbance,” he said.

Underlining the need for the Centre and State governments to work together in a spirit of partnership, he said the conference could demonstrate a resolve to overcome the challenges to internal security.

This was the second meeting of Chief Ministers on internal security this year; the first one was held on January 6. Mr. Chidambaram reminded the Chief Ministers that the entire nation was in a state of shock, grief and anger in the aftermath of the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks.

“Role of police crucial”

Later, at a press conference, the Minister said he drew the Chief Ministers’ attention to the central role of the police in meeting the challenges to internal security and urged them to set up Police Establishment Board and provide a stable and certain tenure to police officers.

“How can an officer provide leadership if his or her tenure is precarious and uncertain? The Police Establishment Board will, in no way, diminish the authority of the Chief Minister or the Home Minister. On the contrary, it will greatly help them in conveying the message of fairness and non-discrimination.” The Chief Ministers could always intervene in exceptional situations.

Mr. Chidambaram urged the State governments to recruit and begin training police personnel at least to the extent of 1.5 lakh vacancies before March 31, 2010. He also argued in favour of raising the strength of police stations to at least 40 personnel.

He said the conference also discussed megacity policing and desert policing and measures to improve police in these areas. More than any other branch of government, it was the police that paid the highest price in terms of human lives that were lost. “In the seven-and-half months of 2009, as many as 303 men and women belonging to the police and paramilitary forces have laid down their lives.”

Modernisation

The conference was unanimous in the demand that modernisation of the police forces should continue for another five to 10 years and more funds should be allocated to it.

There were groups across the border that plotted against India but it did not mean that there was danger of an imminent terror attack. “We must not lower our guard and we shall not lower our guard,” he reiterated.

On the demand raised by Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi that the Centre should clear the proposed Gujarat Control of Organised Crime (GUJCOC) Bill, he said the provisions in it were contrary to the last expression of mind of Parliament. “I cannot, therefore, recommend it for Presidential assent,” he added.

Read Users' Comments (0)

Naxal Problem needs a holistic approach
by - Ashok Handoo,Freelance Writer

If the Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh has been saying it repeatedly that Naxalism is the biggest challenge to our internal security he clearly wants to underline the dangers it has been posing to India, as also the need to deal with the challenge in a most effective way.

Naxalism, which started from Naxalbari area in West Bengal in 1967, ostensibly to champion the cause of small farmers and tribals through violence, was wiped out in 1970. It soon became out of fashion in its homeland West Bengal. But the underground operations of the outfit continued. The problem became more serious after the merger of the Peoples War Group (PWG) and the Maoist Communist Centre (MCC) in September, 2004 which led to the formation of the CPI (Maoist). Naxalism today holds sway in vast swathes of 10 states in the country, involving about 180 districts.

Recently the Home Minister said in the Parliament that Naxal challenge had been underestimated over the years as a result of which left wing extremism had increased its area of influence. The Home Minster said that they now pose a very grave challenge to the state. Just days before his statement 36 policemen, including an SP, had been ambushed by the Maoists in Chhatisgarh.
It was in this backdrop Mr. Chidambaram urged the Members of Parliament to join hands in facing the challenge. “All sections of the house must recognize that if we must remain a democratic, republic ruled by law, we must collectively rise and face the challenge of left wing extremism” Shri Chidambaram said.

In its status report presented to the Parliament on March 13, 2006, the then Home Minister Mr. Shivraj Patil said that the Naxalite movement continues to persist in terms of spatial spread and intensity of violence. He pointed out that it remains an “area of serious concern”. Naxal violence has claimed about 6000 lives during the last 20 years. The question that arises is why have the Naxals been able to extend their area of influence over the years to become a serious threat to the country’s internal security?

It is encouraging to know that the government is not treating it as a mere law and order problem. The 2006 status report itself made it clear that the Government would address the problem in a holistic manner. That includes

‘political security, development and public perception management fronts’

as well. Surely, the Naxal problem is deeply rooted in the social and economic disparities in remote and tribal areas.
Since the fruits of development have not percolated to these areas, the Naxal outfits are able to exploit the sentiments of the local people. But the outfits themselves have been preventing and in fact destroying, developmental initiatives taken by the government. They destroy roads, railway infrastructure and administrative institutions that are needed for speeding up developmental activities. Not only this, they indulge in train hold-ups, jail breaks and attacks on politicians.
That is proof enough to indicate that they do not have real interest in the development of these areas and their loyalties lie elsewhere. Perhaps, they want to usurp political power which, they think, flows through the barrel of the gun.

At the same time, a lot many measures need to be taken to make the fight against Naxalism effective. On top of this is improving governance in the affected areas by moving corrupt officials who exploit the local people. It must also be ensured that large scale projects in these areas do not lead to displacement of people, who in any case, live a life of penury.

Since law and order is a state subject, the role of State Governments in dealing with the problem can hardly be overemphasized. They too have their share of responsibility to fulfil. A good deal of coordination between the Centre and the States is, therefore, called for. This is particularly true in view of the fact that the Outfits have established inter-state networks. The state police need to be modernized to be able to tackle the Naxal attacks. The Greyhounds experiment in Andhra Pradesh is a case in sight. Actionable intelligence collection and sharing mechanisms need to be strengthened. Funds provided to the States under the Police Modernization Scheme need to be better utilized.

The states also need to go fast with raising India Reserve Battalions, particularly in Naxal affected areas, which besides addressing security concerns, provide jobs to the unemployed youth.

A specially trained police force also needs to be put in place to fight the Maoists who basically are adopting guerrilla warfare techniques. There is also a difference in their targets. While other terrorist groups attack the strong foundations of the country such as democracy, secularism and the financial institutions, Maoists make India’s weak points like poverty and economic disparity as their targets. All this needs to be factored in the strategy to deal with the Maoist problem.

Keeping in view the fact that the Naxal groups have been raising mainly land and livelihood issues, it is important that land reforms are taken up on a priority basis. States have also to focus on physical infrastructure like roads, buildings, bridges, railway lines, communications and power etc. There is no room to brook any delay on this account.

Unfortunately, the several rounds of talks held with the Naxals hitherto and the announcements of amnesties and attractive rehabilitation schemes have not worked so far. Some states like Andhra Pradesh have a good rehabilitation policy and it has achieved some success, but a lot more remains to be done.

The Government indeed is committed to address the Naxal problem in right earnest. It is focusing on improving intelligence set up at the state level, providing help to the states to modernize and train their police forces and accelerate development in the affected areas. What is needed is better coordination both on security and developmental fronts to meet the challenge posed by the Naxals.

Read Users' Comments (0)